Dear colleagues! The work done is extremely fine. The practical relevance of the study is undeniable. Careful justification and filigree work of researchers makes it possible to observe not only the technology, but also the philosophy of the new trends of sociology and psychometry. In this context a question arises that is equally methodological and philosophical.
Тo what extent does the exclusion of inconsistent responses from the sample take into account the fundamental unpredictability of the individual response known in psychometry?
To what extent does this exclusion correspond to psychological reality? Does such a sample actually exist? Maybe, such excesses are especially informative in some cases. Is there a separate study of respondents who show insufficient effort?
Dear colleagues! The work done is extremely fine. The practical relevance of the study is undeniable. Careful justification and filigree work of researchers makes it possible to observe not only the technology, but also the philosophy of the new trends of sociology and psychometry. In this context a question arises that is equally methodological and philosophical.
Тo what extent does the exclusion of inconsistent responses from the sample take into account the fundamental unpredictability of the individual response known in psychometry?
To what extent does this exclusion correspond to psychological reality? Does such a sample actually exist? Maybe, such excesses are especially informative in some cases. Is there a separate study of respondents who show insufficient effort?